🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had come from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran does not want be seen to be proceeding from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with the American leader asserting the locations had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions reopen.

Trump recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of international law, Araghchi said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the primary answer to settle disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the face of this invasion."