🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.